4
IFO4
Sign InJoin IFO4
Back to About IFO4
Governance

How IFO4 Is Governed

IFO4 operates through a formal governance model designed to support standards creation, education, research, innovation, and ecosystem alignment. Each governing body has a distinct mandate and accountability structure.

Six Governing Bodies

IFO4 governance is structured across six bodies, each responsible for a critical dimension of the organization's mission.

Global Council
TSC
Technical Standards Council
ECC
Education & Credentialing
IRB
Innovation Review Board
PAC
Partner Advisory Council
NTDG
NTDG

Governance Principles

Every governing body operates under these foundational principles.

Transparency in all decision-making and standards development processes

Independence from vendor influence in all technical standards and certifications

Practitioner-centered governance that reflects real-world implementation needs

Meritocratic leadership based on expertise, contribution, and demonstrated impact

Global representation ensuring diverse perspectives shape the discipline

Continuous improvement driven by evidence, research, and community feedback

Governing Bodies in Detail

Click each council to explore its role, responsibilities, and composition.

Decision Process

How Standards & Policies Are Developed

IFO4 follows a structured, evidence-driven process for all major decisions.

01

Proposal

Ideas are submitted by councils, working groups, or community members and reviewed by the relevant governing body.

02

Review & Validation

The responsible council evaluates the proposal. The NTDG may be engaged for field validation and evidence gathering.

03

Approval

Approved proposals are formalized by the relevant council and ratified by the Global Council for organization-wide adoption.

04

Publication

Finalized standards, policies, and programs are published and communicated to the IFO4 community and ecosystem.

Get Involved in IFO4 Governance

IFO4 governance is designed to be accessible and community-driven. Members can contribute through working groups, council nominations, community feedback, and standards development participation.